Friday, June 25, 2004

Moving on(.org).

Josh, ever the literalist, took my snarky pseudo-Oprah terminology and ran with it. Whatevs.

The point is: whether we like it or not (and whether we discuss him or not) at this moment in time, Michael Moore is very much relevant. He is the most talked about filmmaker of the moment with the most-discussed film of the moment. (Again: thanks be to Shiva for the end of The Passion discourse.) Plus he is viewed by many to be an important voice in the political realm. Add in essays and op-ed pieces weighing in on the movie/hype from nearly every columnist, writer and/or thinker that I read regularly... and, well, that's a lot of blog fodder. With that equation it would be silly for me to ignore it and not post on it at length.

Unlike Pier's herpes, this shit is almost out of my system.


At 3:02 PM, Blogger Dashiell said...

All this is interesting true, because out there, many people are coming at it from all angles. But here, basically everyone is in agreement, so it turns in to one post after the other of the same, redundant, repeated, continuous, and superfluous points of view.



Post a Comment

<< Home